There are many settings within DXO which you may not be aware of.
Obviously you have been shooting raw for a few months and so are familiar with LR. Why not put the raw on Dropbox so that someone who is familiar with DXO could see what they can do? I am really disappointed on the result as I had a hope that DxO might actually do it for me! Please note that I did not use any noise reduction in either programs. To my eyes at least there is no comparison between the two results - photolab result has loss of detail (please compare the bright part at the center and the rock at the forefront!
Dpreview dxo photolab 3 plus#
The adjustments made relate again to highlights and shadows use of smart lighting and clearview adjustments plus the increase of exposure by 1. I tried everything I could and the result is the following I tried to achieve a similar result with Photolab which admittedly I am not very familiar. I performed minimal PP in LR - namely I "played" with the highlights / shadows and white and black sliders while I increased the exposure by 1.
The photo library can process third-party application synchronisations and EXIF data. In the original shot I obviously exposed for the highlights. It gives Adobe Lightroom a run for its money. I wanted to test the two with a rather difficult shoot you can see below. I am also looking for an LR alternative and initially I thought that Photolab would be a good choice now they added local processing. I am amateur doing as relatively little PP. the latest DxO Photolab and I must come upfront saying I am disappointed by the later. I would like to put forward my experience in comparing LR 5 Vs.
0 kommentar(er)
